"*" indicates required fields Your Name*SELECT ONEAbby RobinsonGreg AdamsHannah DavidianHunter NurdinJason BaxterLiz KisselburghLorna HeathRob BrandtShana CrawfordSteve BaileyPresenter Name*SELECT ONEAdrienne ArebaloAustin MartinsenAnna EscobedoBlaze BrownlowBrittany BrandtBrenna MeierChris HoganChris WuDavid BlusanovicsDebbie ContrerasDesirae JonesEmily McMenaminGabe GaucinHannah LeClairJohn WallJordan FreitasJoshua JacksonKelley LockabyKim MitchellLauren VallesMisty KnoxMorgan StaralNatalie OverbeyNicole StarrPratik DaveRaven GrimesRicardo CejaRyan YoungSanjay PadhiarSarah GadsonShelbi RaetzThomas PfeiferINNOVATION AND CREATIVITY 1: Idea is not creative or innovative. 2-3: Minimal signs of creativity or innovation. 4-5: Some creative elements but largely based on existing ideas. 6-7: Moderately creative and shows some original thinking. 8-9: Highly creative and mostly original. 10: Exceptionally creative and groundbreaking. Innovation and Creativity Score*SELECT ONE12345678910BUSINESS IMPACT 1: No discernible impact on Fort Capital's operations. 2-3: Minimal impact, unlikely to bring significant benefits. 4-5: Some impact, but limited in scope or effectiveness. 6-7: Moderate impact with potential for noticeable benefits. 8-9: High impact, likely to bring significant benefits. 10: Exceptional impact, transformative for the company. Business Impact Score*SELECT ONE12345678910FEASIBILITY OF SOLUTION 1: Completely impractical and unfeasible. 2-3: Highly impractical, requiring excessive resources. 4-5: Somewhat feasible but with considerable challenges. 6-7: Moderately feasible with manageable challenges. 8-9: Highly feasible, easily implementable. 10: Exceptionally feasible, almost ready for immediate implementation. Feasibility of Solution Score*SELECT ONE12345678910TIMELINESS OF IMPACT 1: No impact expected in a reasonable timeframe. 2-3: Long-term impact, but nothing in the foreseeable future. 4-5: Some impact expected, but not soon. 6-7: Moderate impact expected in a reasonable timeframe. 8-9: High impact expected in the near future. 10: Immediate and significant impact expected. Timeliness of Impact Score*SELECT ONE12345678910UTILIZATION OF AI 1: No use of AI or extremely poor utilization. 2-3: Minimal or ineffective use of AI. 4-5: Some use of AI, but not integrated well. 6-7: Good use of AI, integrated into the project. 8-9: Excellent use of AI, enhancing the project significantly. 10: Exceptional use of AI, integral to the project's success. Utilization of AI Score*SELECT ONE12345678910PRESENTATION SKILLS 1: Disorganized and ineffective presentation. 2-3: Poorly organized, lacking clarity or effectiveness. 4-5: Adequate but with room for improvement. 6-7: Good presentation, clear and organized. 8-9: Excellent presentation, very effective and engaging. 10: Exceptional presentation, perfectly clear, organized, and compelling. Presentation Skills Score*SELECT ONE12345678910